Q29: Are there any Congressional, Defense, or Army mandates impacting the ideals or welfare of the Academy, or Graduates, which concern you?

The following are the raw comments collected for this survey question.  The numbers serve only to identify the comment for this question and do not serve any other identification purpose:

[001]  Loss of Regular Commission upon graduation.

[002]  Funding and any moves to consolidate all service academies

[003]  Sure..... The services need a single agency that will focus our needs and resources on the specific issues. Today, these groups appear to look like a bag of parts. Believe all groups should consolidate to focus and make their point.

[004]  This extends from my comment above, that West Point still finds itself in a spiral of declining influence and support in the Army, with its relevance under scrutiny and challenge. The last time a run on USMA resourcing was overturned occured in 1988 when General Art Brown was VCSA. Since then we have seen a decline in all areas: OMA, MCA, reduction in size of the Corps and faculty, etc. etc. The sad state of funding for the Arvin gymnasium renovation is but one example. In this regard perhaps AOG should be doing more to "lobby" for West Point, as AUSA does for the Army. Since the apperance some years ago of the White '67/Fagan '69 authored pamphlet "You're Getting a Lot for your Money, Congressman," I haven't seen much in this regard.

[005]  The new OER is a disgrace. As bad as the previous one was, this is worse.

[006]  RA Commissions--West Pointers deserve RA commissions (as do ROTC-DMGs). There ought to be some reward for 1) being selected over 90% of one's high school peers and 2) surviving a rigorous 4-year education that has (had?) a >25% attrition rate.

[007]  I'm concerned with the authorization of an early out program for '96 grads to serve in the National Guard; this should not have been done. Grads need to serve out their full commitment before leaving Active Duty.

[008]  Budget allocation appears inadequate Press reports about USMA Prep being used to achieve racial and gender goals is disturbing. Equal treatment of all applicants ought to be a hallmark for USMA and USMA Prep.

[009]  Recent report on basic training and impact of "coed" military environment, especially lowering of training standards to accommodate differences in the sexes.

[010]  General underfunding of the Academy.

[011]  I regret that they are too complex to discuss here. They relate mostly to national policies being followed by Congress or the Administration with regard to treatment of people.

[012]  The loss of RA status upon graduation

[013]  See 28 above. If we don't cut back we could lose the entire operation. Many think that ROTC and OCS can do the job at a lot less cost to the tax payer. Be pro-active!

[014]  Current President's dislike for Military

[015]  All service academy graduates should be offered and required to accept a Regular commission.

[016]  Changing the words in the cadet prayer was wrong. When an attempt is made to change the word of The Corps, expect to see huge backlash by graduates.

[017]  see above

[018]  All three of these entities seem to be willing to allow deep pocket contributors to support the USMA.

[019]  I'm probably missing it, but it doesn't look to me like HQDA is fighting very hard for $$ for WP. Seems like USNA and USAFA are doing much better. Every dollar we give up and fund through the WP Fund, is a dollar we'll never get back!

[020]  If the above trend continues USMA could find itself (as in the past) under attack. Why a fully funded national "university" when states and private universities with ROTCs and the OCS program can fill officer requirements? The "uniqueness" of a USMA education shold be the primary recuiting tool, not the academic reputation.

[021]  I have the general feeling, not backed up by facts, that the overall value of the Academy has been devalued over time. I think in the minds of many USMA does not occupy the same preeminent position it did some time back. This is where the efforts of the AOG can help. If the institution is not recognized for it's contributions to the nation it becomes vulnerable to attack.

[022]  Too many to mention here .... mission, pay, medical care, family support, career progression, weapons procurement, etc,..etc,...

[023]  The RA commission issue did

[024]  Appropriations for the Academy are inadequate. One small example is the virtual destruction of the USMA Band. So-called cutbacks have eliminated the Hellcats, for example.

[025]  1. Women quotas (this has been ongoing for a long time). 2. Increased minimum year payback for grads (this time service 3. Decreased active and retired benifits - particularly medical and dental.

[026]  The eroding of the military base, coupled with the low number of congressional members who are Academy graduates (from any Academy) provides a potential that must be watched. I believe that we will see less support for the Academies in the future.

[027]  The awarding of a reserve commission, rather than an RA commission, strikes a blow to the mission of the Academy. Graduates should be given the RA commission as a symbol of the lifetime of service the Academy prepares them for.

[028]  Excessive Congressional meddling and micromanaging in "politically correct" issues at all levels

[029]  Budget cutbacks + increased commitments = disaster We have a hollow Army again but the Army leadership refuses to admit it or deal with it.

[030]  Consider the goals of the Retired Officer's Association. As I read their literature, they appear to remain informed on pending legislation which impact soldiers. We should remain as vigilant.

[031]  We must fight to keep our past system alive.

[032]  The fact that graduation no longer guarantees a Regular Army commission. While the competition may be valuable, one has to ask how USMA is different that ROTC...what justifies the extra cost?

[033]  RA commissions - What a blow to USMA morale, prestige and self respect! - The new policy must have had the same impact on ROTC cadets and graduates.

[034]  gays in the military

[035]  Given the current administration, I am concerned about potential cuts in compensation and services for active and retired service members.

[036]  I hope that the Army is not losing the "eye of the tiger" in this era of polictal correctness. As a former special operations pilot I realize the importance of being good as opposed to just looking good. Killing is what we do best.

[037]  We did a lousy job fighting Sam Nunn on the regular commision for graduates. There are those that would like to see the doors of all the Academies closed. The logic being that the academies cost a heck of a lot more than the ROTC programs. Therefor, why spend all that money. This issue has not died and the AOG must be ever vigilant

[038]  USMA funding cuts

[039]  Denial of regular commissions to Academy AND distinguished ROTC graduates.

[040]  I feel that pressure from DOD, Congress etc. has transformed USMA from its focus of producing military leaders to one of a general university.

[041]  As a general proposition, I do not trust Congress, otherwise, no.

[042]  The Reserve Commission to graduates issue.

[043]  Graduates should graduate as Regular Army officers. Graduates should serve their complete obligated service time---no exception, except for non performers.

[044]  I believe West Point lost a good deal of its raison d'etre when it ceased commissioning exclusively in the combat arms. FACT: any of us can name a dozen great ROTC programs that represent a less expensive alternative in the minds of the taxpayers ... to say nothing about the minds of the non-West Point Army leadership. Instead of spending time and money "telling our story to the public", we should reduce the Corps to a reasonable size and return to combat arms-only commissioning. Since Congress (hell, our own leadership) will never let that happen, we are in deep trouble. The central problem: West Point's core values may be heroic, but they only really depart from the norm when one adds the fact of combat arms leadership preparation. Absent that, and other institutions can do close enough to the job we are doing so that our existance rapidly becomes an expensive non-essential.

[045]  RA commission issue-NO problem 5, 6 vs. 8 year obligation-seems fixed Constant undercurrent of "why an Academy" on Capitol Hill-YES Diversion of too many new grads to Med School, Law and now CSS roles-YES (Every branch needs a solid core of LTs. Is USMA the best source for AG or Finance officers? I don't know....

[046]  I am not aware of any, but wish to learn more.

[047]  The recuring desire to remove the funding for the Academy from the budget.

[048]  Funding for the academy. Is the politically correct solution the best for the academy?????

[049]  Restore RA commissions on graduation. If this is not possible, make them effective one year after graduation which is what I understand the current law allows. Stop direct commissioning into combat-service-support branches. Require two year detail in a combat or combat-support branch first.

[050]  1.Loss of the Regular Commission w/probation at Graduation. 2.Errosion of active duty and retired medical benefits. 3. Need for a FEHBA-65 type program for retirees over age 65.

[051]  See above

[052]  If we don't show we are something "special," then we deserve to be closed and the Nation will rely on ROTC/OCS. We have to get back to our "roots" and not try to be "Ivy League."

[053]  Bill Clinton

[054]  Poor treatmenr by C in C.

[055]  Hard to be specific, but in essence: Will West Point survive its third century? In the face of apparently declining support in the Congress; in the face of declining numbers of graduates in the Army's top ranks; in the face of rising costs for the USMA education.

[056]  I am concerned about the loss of a regular army commission for graduates, but do not believe any move should be taken to try to overturn the legislation. There is already too much talk about consolidating or eliminating the academies.

[057]  See 28 above.

[058]  Let me know who I can forward a draft of a book, In Defense of the Republic. It needs editorial help but it outlines the thoughts.

[059]  The new regular commissioning process. It should be returned to the system where service academy graduates and distinguished ROTC (and equivalent for other services) graduates receive regular commissions on graduation.

[060]  Graduates should receive regular commissions.

[061]  Cutting funding Regular Army commissioning Service Oblgation lenth (5 years max)

[062]  First off of course is the subject of "no regular army commission" at graduation. Secondly is the DOA approach to this by waiting to field grade.

[063]  Lack of regular Army commission upon graduation, Lack of funding to continue WP as a world class institurion

[064]  1. regular commissions for graduates of all service academies 2. I'm unsure if I favor or disfavor provision of substantial funding from graduates/AOG vice U. S. Treasury

[065]  I am concerned about too many civilian instructors at West Point.

[066]  Personally, I like the idea of both genders training and serving together. They do in the private sector and, again, limiting such "cultural" and intellectual exchange can lead to suspicion or marginalization. I also think that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, the Army has done a better job than it appears in teaching the sexes to get along. A little more emphasis on the positive (particularly by those researching how the Army does things) might result in a more balanced and comprehensive view of the problems and solutions the Army has experienced which, actualoly, are a reflection of what the populace at large faces. In my opinion.

[067]  One can only worry about the long term effect of both an executive branch and a Congress with ever decreasing military experience and understanding;.

[068]  The Regular Commission Dispute

[069]  The consolidation of the academies into one. This concern is linked to my above concern about the watering down of the academy experience.

[070]  I am afraid that our more recent graduates are being subjected to a mental browbeating by the congressional tribe of "peacemongers" who wish to look like they have found another source of frivelous spending of hard earning "tax-payers" moneys by having military academies at all.

[071]  Lack of Regular commissions at graduation.

[072]  The entire realm of what is "politically correct" versus what is morally right is slowly filtering through all of society. I would hope the AOG would not succumb to what is currently popular out of expediency. I cannot point to a specific mandate as asked above but it is more just a sense of where the country is going. I would hope West Point not lose sight of its traditions.

[073]  Politically correct quota systems. Tolerance for lower and graying of previously held ethical standards. Lowering of physical standards to accomodate women.

[074]  not providing regular army commissions to graduates

[075]  All academy and honor ROTC graduates should be awarded a regular commission. They deserve nothing less.

[076]  No RA No support on the politacal level The fear of senior staff to make a decision that might rock the waves at the civilian level. Ie the failure of the Chairmen fing to autorize a SOC mission to recover the FA18 pilot in DS

[077]  The continuing issues of women in the services as well as the Clinton administration policies on homesexual members of the services.

[078]  Maintaining standards in light of the gender problems faced by the Army and Academy. Must continue to resist the efforts to allow women in the combat arms or in combat. Their presence in forward combat support and combat service support units is bad enough.

[079]  I comment on those directly as an Academy Professor and will save you the space here.

[080]  The changes in commissioning and the degrading of the West Points systems that existed for almost 2 centureis.

[081]  Lack of appropriated funding at a constant level allowing the Supe to forecast and carry out the programs necessary to have a quality Military Academy. Unfortunately, this is a sign of the times.

[082]  I think the size of the Cadet Corps should be reduced greatly to reflect the return to a smaller army. Better to have more quality than quantity. Then the graduates should be regular army. We had 472 in the class and that might be sufficient for the army today. Of course there are many things of concern as a retired officer, but not specifically related to West Point - such as lost medical care and coming reductions in commisary etc etc.

[083]  1. Loss of RA Commissions 2. Reduction in the number of West Point graduates selected for high rank 3. Low retention rates for graduates in the active army 4. Forcing graduates off active duty so they cannot pursue a full Army career 5. The Army's failure to effectively utilize USMA graduates

[084]  I am concerned that cadets are not given a regular commission.

[085]  Early outs-grads should complete 5 year commitment on Active Duty, not in the NG. Recruitment of minority candidates for USMA-USMA population should reflect our society as a whole, to include an equal representation of all Americans.

[086]  Present globalist/pro-UN policies.

[087]  I know of no mandates, other than forcing women into everything--and apparently those women in the service don't want much of what's being forced---I'm damned tired of social engineering!

[088]  Several things are of concern: the decision to grant only reserve commissions; the declining budget support from Congress and the Army; the plea from the Supe for graduates to provide monetary support that should be provided by the Army via budgetary support from Congress;

[089]  Failure to commission graduates in the Regular Army.

[090]  Many of the actions taken by Congress which reduce the "value" of the military compensation package make it very difficult for soldiers to remain dedicated to life-long service to the nation . We must continue to protect all benefits so that we can continue to attract and retain the high caliber of people that we have now.

[091]  removing the RA designation

[092]  Developing a paper

[093]  I am unaware of any at this time, except for the current chief executive.

[094]  see 28

[095]  Periodic challenges by congress on USMA mission and existence. Need to continue to show cost benefit.

[096]  Not obtaining a regular commission upon graduates. This appears a major step toward reducing USMA to an ROTC type college, or worse, eliminating USMA. I went to USMA because it was the sole best way to get to be a Regular officer. Evidently not necessarily true any longer.

[097]  RESERVE COMMISSIONS HAVE TO GO. INADEQUATE BASOPS/INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING MUST CEASE. THE AOG CAN RAISE FUNDS BUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MUST CONTINUE TO PAY IT'S SHARE.

[098]  Mistress of the Sword RA Commissioning

[099]  The continued rumors and activities by Congressional members to eliminate or combine the Academies.

[100]  RA Commissions Downgrading leadership to a committee affair. Sharing and warm fuzzies and all.

[101]  Same as #28: I do not support using USMA as a social laboratory. I believe decisions should be based upon how USMA reflects society rather than is the forebearer of social evolution. I recognize changes will occur, but let changes occur to catch USMA up with society rather than the converse. I do not support using USMA as a social laboratory. I believe decisions should be based upon how USMA reflects society rather than is the forebearer of social evolution. I recognize changes will occur, but let changes occur to catch USMA up with society rather than the converse.

[102]  I do not wish to take the time to elaborate. An example is the regular commission issue.

[103]  Yes, the fact that even though we are drawing down our forces (almost 50% reduction since I have been in), we never seem to reduce the size of the Corps. There is not as big a need for LT's these days, as is evidenced by all the "early outs" being offered of recent graduates, and the active duty end stregnth is still going down. How can we expect the size of the Corps to stay the same? The message it sends is "Don't worry cadet, the liklehood of you being needed through your 6 year commitment is minimal", which to me seems to spark a less than commital attitude about serving the nation. The cadets come here knowing that many people are released from service without serving their obligation (servng in the inactive reserve for the remainder of a commitment is hardly the same as serving on active duty). How can we justify to the Public that we still, today, with a reduction in force, need to accept as many (or nearly as many) new cadets as we did 8 or 10 years ago?

[104]  -- Civilian faculty -- lack of RA commissions

[105]  1) Downsizing. Physical impact on Army and mental impact on current and potential members. 2) Reduced funding and effect on warfighting readiness. 3) 2 wars simultaneously with current size of Army! 4) Sexual harrasment turning into witch hunts.

[106]  CURRENTLY, THE ARMY MAY REDUCE USMA'S TACTICAL OFFICER STAFF BY APPROXIMATELY TEN PERCENT. THAT IS, EACH REGIMENT MAY LOSE ONE COMPANY. IF THIS OCCURS, TACTICAL OFFICERS WILL RECEIVE AN INCREASE OF APPROXIMATELY 14 CADETS PER COMPANY. WHILE THIS NUMBER IS STILL QUITE MANAGEABLE, DECISION MAKERS MUST CONSIDER HOW THEIR DECISIONS WILL IMPACT THE QUALITY OF THE OUTPUT. THAT IS, IF TACTICAL OFFICERS ARE UNABLE TO DEVOTE THE AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY FOR GOOD INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT, A VERY IMPORTANT QUALITY ASSURANCE PIECE MAY BE LOST.

[107]  Regular Army, lowering of standards to be politically correct

[108]  I don't even know what they are, but there is always some liberal nut in Congress that wants to weaken the great traditions of West Point or diminish it's mission. Constant guard must be kept. I firmly believe that homosexuality is a mental disorder which is characterized by amoral and deviate behavior which must not be tolerated in the military, and especially at the Academy.

[109]  reserve commissions for graduates. Lack of graduates in command positions.

[110]  Growing internationalism concerns me deeply. See my comments above regarding the subordination of national interests to the "greater good" of our world community.

[111]  Letter to Jack Hammack later.

[112]  I believe that the policy of not giving regular commissions to academy and distinguished ROTC graduates is wrong and should be changed.

[113]  I think making USMA coed has greatly reduced its prestige -- but it is the law of the land!

[114]  But they are all well above my retired pay grade or ability to meaningfully affect !

[115]  1. Loss of regular army commission requirement. 2. Loss of combat arms requirement. 3. Politically correct approach to military service.

[116]  Retirement Benefits Security

[117]  It concerns me that Academy Graduates do not receive an Active Duty Commission upon graduation but must now compete with graduates of other programs. I think with the additional time that must be served and the current status of the army (re: downsizing, rifs, early outs), not having an Commission after graduation only spurs more graduates to leave service early or after their service committment is over.

[118]  Draw down is affecting the entire Army. We are setting ourselves up for another Task Force Smith. A Zero Defect mentality is manifesting itself. Commanders are becoming experts at being "spin doctors". Many of the really good officers are getting out and starting civilian careers. Officers that are marginal and have non-marketable skills are hanging in there and telling the "Boss" what ever he wants to hear.

[119]  See above.

[120]  The current affermative action movements concern me. As I stated previously, regardless of federal legislation, West Point must remain wholly accessable to all minority groups represented in the United States. More to the point, West Point ought to take an aggressive stance to ensure that minority representation is AGGRESSIVELY attained and that our minority enrollment reflects the demographics of the American People, not the demographics of the U.S.Army.

[121]  The recent meeting of past Supe's should be an annual occurence. I was particularly pleased with the comments of General Berry.

[122]  Don't know

[123]  Downsizing

[124]  Reserve commission for graduates

[125]  Too many women in the Academy.

[126]  Differences between services on funding of WP facilities. The fact the Sup has to send such a significant amount of his time fund raising.

[127]  Reserve status of newly commissioned LTs

[128]  Again, the mandates concerning women and their integration. Combat branches and selection are no longer mandatory. Not granting Regular Army commissions is a seriously negative impact, and the softening of ideals, standards and academic requirements are all serious threats to the basic fabric of the Institution.

[129]  Eliminating initial RA commission. Making grads look and feel more and more like their ROTC counterparts.

[130]  In summary, "The Corps Has"

[131]  Women Civilian instructors/professors Regular commissions

[132]  I do not have enough facts to answer this properly.

[133]  Money

[134]  What impact the "separated by sex" basic training might have on Beast Barracks.

[135]  Graudates should still be "special", in terms of commission, DOR and primary assignment to combat arms. USMA should not be just another ROTC program.

[136]  This is a pretty broad question. I believe there is a growing perception among members of congress that service academies are too expensive and have outgrown their usefulness. This perception will spread as more members enter congress who have never had experience with the military service. Our Academy could "wither on the vine" due to lack of congressional support unless we stay proactively involved in informing and educating them about West Point. This could be done in partnership with our sister academy organizations.

[137]  Continual Congressional questioning of the relevance of USMA

[138]  THE LACK OF INTEGRITY IN THIS ADMINISTRATION CONCERNS ME IN THAT THERE IS A POSSIBLE EFFECT ON THE WELFARE OF THE CORPS.

[139]  We need to always be aware of the shifting support for the nation's armed services and the academies. An effort to assure that the education provided by USMA will be seen as "uniquely" in touch with future defense needs could help assure long term support. We must not be seen as just another college that happens to be "free" for the nuisance of wearing uniforms for 4/6 years. Some of these directions will be anathema to traditionalists - will go into the soft stuff like nation-building, civic action, etc. Problem is that "warrior" class is simply not going to get much support.

[140]  Just about anything.

[141]  Don't know

[142]  ignorant of what is going on

[143]  see above

[144]  Removal of policy of not awarding Regular Commisssions to graduates.

[145]  West Point graduates should be commissioned in the Regular Army with at least a five year commitment. Furthermore all males should be required to Branch into Combat Arms unless they have a disqualifying physical problem.

[146]  i may be out of touch but this whole concept of PC will, I think, weaken our military and eventuall USMA-it is already starting a societal backlash and resentment

[147]  Talk of West Point not being needed to develop officers for the service of our country.

[148]  making decisions that are politically correct rarther than decisions that are based on facts and experience

[149]  Reserve commisions for graduates.

[150]  The obvious dislisk and distaste that this administration executive branch) has for the military and its' lack of support.

[151]  I am personally sickened and embarrassed by our current administration and the effect it has had on national moral conduct. I know the relative peace that we enjoy inevitably leads to a smaller military, but these guys would cut troop strength in any case. Get our regular Army troops out of Bosnia, Africa and whatever other godforsaken messes we are into right now. Special ops, CIA, etc. are beter suited and trained for these missions. You asked.

[152]  I am concerned about recent public satements by Army officials regarding sexual harassment & equality in the Army. It appears Army officials are eager to avoid conflict with the present administration regarding women soldiers. Army officers should be first and foremost concerned with the quality of our combat units, even at the expense of "sexual equality." They need to voice the truth that while women have a vital role to play in the military, we must not sacrifice military readiness for furthering social goals. My particular concern is that the the Army is unwilling to admit that intergration of women into certain units has been a failure for fear of backlash from the President & the media.

[153]  Increasing civilianization of the faculty.

[154]  There is too much emphasis on keeping cadets once they make it through R-day. If people want to leave, let them. If people have problems with telling the truth, throw them out. Trust me, I've graduated with enough shitbags already.

[155]  see 28

[156]  There have been some attempts at doing away with the military academies as being unnecessary. This would be a great mistake for the country.

[157]  Feel very strongly that USMA and the Army have let down graduates by not fighting for RA Commission immediately upon graduation. Waiting until reaching grade O-4 gives graduate no incentive to remain in Military Service.

[158]  Same old, same old. I think the women in combat branches should be proportional to the women in the NFL, NBA, major league baseball and professional boxing. Are those physically tougher than armed combat?

[159]  No Regular Commission for graduates Low retention percentage Too many graduates

[160]  The laws governing nomination and appointment to the Academies (all of them) are antiquated and political. Many members of Congress use selection panels to arrive at their nomination lists. Appointment should be based on "best qualified" and the congressional element elimninated. It is just another step in the process that has existed for many years and no-one has had the "guts" or gumption to change it. The Coast Guard Academy is an exception. What's wrong with their system? Of course we want geographical distribution for cadet selection/admission, but why do we need the Congressional input? Look at the system used by the USAFA when it was first established. That system has more to offer than the present one used by USMA, USNA, USAFA. The current law goes back to the 1830's. It's time for a change.

[161]  lack of funding

[162]  See above

[163]  1. Lack of sufficient funds to maintain the physical plant. 2. Lack of clarity of mission of West Point in contrast to other learning institutions. i.e., how do we justify the cost of training and educating cadets in terms of return on investment for the military?

[164]  Forcing reserve commissions on USMA graduates eliminates the primary reason I went to USMA, to be a career officer in the Regular Army! Forced branching of lieutenants into other than their choice leaves a sense of bitterness even after they are successful in that branch.

[165]  See above.

[166]  Female cadets and recent "breast feeding" episode that I watched on television.

[167]  See question 28 response.

[168]  Accepting women, who aren't allowed to serve in combat. Racial preferences.

[169]  lack of adequate funding.

[170]  1. Regular Officer status of Graduates. 2. Size of the Corps of Cadets.

[171]  Congress must fund the Army and West Point at an adequate level. AOG must fignt against budget cuts for basic needs especially while Congress and the Administration continue to fund unneeded acquisition and maintain unneeded installations.

[172]  I have tried to state them in my previous notes.

[173]  Too much political correctness - Separate men and women, etc. New Mission statement? That's a concern, I suppose.

[174]  I continue to be concerned with how women cadets are integrated into the academy. There were double standards when I was there ('83-'87) and I don't think women were challenged enough. The army is not as nice to our women graduates as was the academy.

[175]  Lower standards based on "inclusion".

[176]  Women attending. The women should have a separate service academy. Old traditions were proper ones and this is the same for civilian as well as military. Having too close contact among those with raging hormones diverts attention from the primary job of providing the best education. This is equally true for both sexes. I can't imagine having had to cope with this as a cadet. Nor can I fully appreciate the difficulty my daughter had being in the first class with females. I strongly feel the whole experiment was not sufficiently thought out prior to implementation.

[177]  1. Increasing number of civilian faculty 2. Loss of Regular Army commission status upon graduation 3. Size of Corps of Cadets should be reduced to reflect downsizing of Army or, preferably, more young grads should be encouraged to stay on active duty, as opposed to being encouraged to leave.

[178]  1. Lack of Regular commissions for Academy and DMG graduates. 2. Firing of Col. Hallums 3. Selection of a person without batallion command time as Mistress of the Sword 4. Relaxation of the strenuous life of the cadet.

[179]  The loss of the RA commission upon graduation is bound to have a negative impact on those cadets who are interested in a career in the Army. It also adds to the "ammunition" I cited above.

[180]  Failure to award RA commission on graduation.

[181]  Army studies to eliminate West Point.

[182]  RA commissions.

[183]  Grads should receive Regular commisions after 2 years. More emphasis placed on fighting spirit- get away from our current liberal do-good, be nice attitude.We keep asking our troops and officers to do more and more with less and less- this impacts morale, retention,and espirit.

[184]  The abolition of Regular Army status for Graduates of USMA and ROTC DMGs. Also the forced feeding of females into the academies.

[185]  Restore regular commissions for all graduates.

[186]  Treatment of females.

[187]  Lack of GI Bill for class of 1977

[188]  regular army commissions

[189]  Congressional - Someone got the bright idea that men and women are identical (as opposed to equal in value). Sorry, but several million years of evolution says they are not identical. Treating men and women as if they were identical simply will not work, however much wishful thinking goes on. Even the Isralies gave up on it, and their very existance depends on suffecient manpower in the military. Thus, different standards; and from different standards, different classes of soldiers - perception being reality (1st law of marketing).

[190]  The issue of increasing the percentage of civilian instructors concerns me. We must make it clear to Congress that academic qualifications are only part of what makes an instructor qualified at USMA-- civilians cannot offer insights on military leadership, the army in general, or offer advice relating to cadet life beyond academics.

[191]  Inadequate funding to maintain the infrastructure. Reserve commissions. Not that I object in principle, because we all know that West Point graduates its fair share of duds who shouldn't be inflicted on soldiers. But it shows that the political and senior military leadership no longer views the Academy as especially unique--a dangerous and troubling trend that the academy seems not to be struggling to overturn. Don't write letters to congressmen about commissions; make damned sure your policies result in an institution that is so unique and valuable that its worth is self-evident.

[192]  West Point must continue its leadership position in today's Army.

[193]  See comments above.

[194]  Cut in authorized strength of the USCC.

[195]  Don't agree with the proposd new polic y of not commissioning graduates in the regular army immediately upon graduation.

[196]  The idea of eliminating the USMA band to save dollars seems penny wise and pound foolish. I can still remember the boost to morale it provided.

[197]  I believe that women are being treated preferentially - not only in the Academy, but in the Army as well - out of fear of having sexual harrassment charges brought.

[198]  Far to many to list in this forum. In gereral, I am concerned for the longevety of the corps.

[199]  No RA commissions for graduates--pls. fix to status quo ante.

[200]  I am sure that there are, but I am not aware of any at this time.

[201]  Attitudes - I can not be specific

[202]  -Reductions in budget dollars driving need for more fund-raising -"Don't ask/don't tell" very inappropriate for academy cadets & ROTC program -Still don't like the idea of the sky boxes/preferred seating and there is a feeling among many that some back room deal was brokered to sell this to enough to gain support; even though many grads do not support ... need to rethink this initiative carefully before moving forward

[203]  The current "don't ask - don't tell" policy is unacceptable. The policies regarding the Armed Forces mission in Bosnia (I realize that this is not really a mandate, however, the current administration does not seem to have established a clear mission for our Armed Forces in this region).

[204]  Impact of feminization of military Downsizing at the same time overall increase mission deployment Loss of junior officers due to extended deployments in peace time

[205]  The social experimentation in the Army and the Academy has led to dramatic deterioration of the Concept of duty, honor, country as defined hence reduced if not eliminated READINESS FOR WAR. Part of this is the RA commission, the size of the Academy and the requirements for a certain 5 of civilian instructors. I believe all were mandated.

[206]  Graduates not receiving a RA commission

[207]  See above, please

[208]  EXPLAINED ABOVE

[209]  We always here about the idea of closing West Point every year and because West Point is a historical institution I don't really give these screams alot of credibility.

[210]  I am concerned about the character of government officials in the administratiuon and in Congress. It does not bode well for the future. I am also concerned about the lack of emphasis on producing officers trained specifically for combat leadership. We don't do it well nowadays, and this is not good. We won't recognize it until we've lost soldiers on some future battlefield, then we'll play the blame game. Tragic.

[211]  I think that the mandate to have more Civilian instructors serverly impact the whole Army. Though Civilians are vital for the Academy. Army instructors provide not only insight to Cadtes on life in the Army and act as a role model, but they allow the Army to commit funds to further educate officers that will be leading the Army in the 21st Century. The education of officers in the Civilain Colleges is vital for the growth of the army in the information age, just as the Gernmans did in the interwar years. It allows growth that otherwise would be impossible to fund

[212]  Congressional mandate to require graduates to compete for RA commission on equal basis with other commission sources begs the question, "Is USMA different?"

[213]  Civilianization of the faculty Status of graduates OPMS XXI JODSF for grads who are Rhodes/Hertz/Marshall Scholars

[214]  The idea of only giving Grads reserve status to fulfill their service obligation and the annual discussion of whether service academies are necessary.

[215]  FUNDING!!!!

[216]  Periodic calls to do away with support for the military academies concern me.

[217]  The stated or implied concept of medical care for life for retirees needs to be addressed. It is a sham as currently structured, retirees shifting to Medicare/ Medicaid when achieving 65 or requsite financial condition. In short it has Not been the TRUTH that career soldiers have labored for. USMA and AOG in particular should support the Military Coalition efforts to insure that retirees can shift to the FEHBP program, like other federal retirees and CONGRESSMEN !

[218]  See above (#28)

[219]  Not really a mandate, but funding is always an issue. Especially, don't want graduates to feel that they must provide funding in order to keep the Academy running properly.

[220]  Funding

[221]  graduates should receive regular commissions

[222]  General cuts in Defense

[223]  Lack of funding for Academy.

[224]  Womwn in Combat. Obsession with homosexuals

[225]  Need to insure that there is an effective lobbying effort to keep the message and the mission in front of Congress and to keep the AOG aware of potential threats or funding cuts well ahead of decision points.

[226]  lack of RA commission

[227]  Our "quota system" for women and minoirities is diluting the standards and creating biases within the other cadets.

[228]  The ability for recent graduates to be relieved of their active duty service obligation prior to its completion, often as early as two years.

[229]  RA Commissions - perception by many grads that this is the first step along the road to ruin, where West Point becomes just another ROTC program, not cost effective, thus an easy target for budget cutters. Must actively prove that USMA grads provide what other sources cannot.

[230]  Only the movements that surface every so often that have as their purpose the elimination or combination of the Service Academies. One must consider the source, but we always have to be ready to defend our position.

[231]  Recent congressional action in the FY 1998 Defense Apropriations Bill to make commanders more accountable for and involved with conduct of their subordinates. The rational for this was the "decline of leadership" in the Army. I do not understand how eight years of downsizing Army leaders, with a personnel policy of retaining only the best, results in a smaller Army with weakened leadership.

[232]  Whether you like to admit it or not, female admission has lowered the standards of the academy; excessive concern for legalisms has blunted the desire & ability of grads to do their jobs. Raise the standards & toughen the course; reinstall an operating fourth-class system; get back to the discipline of an engineering curriculum. You've got a college on your hands now, not an Academy.

[233]  1. "Don't ask, Don't tell" -- enough said.

[234]  I think the President and Congress' troop deployments without establishing clear goals and objectives for each mission is terrible. To this day, I fail to see the importance of Bosnia or Haiti on US national interest. The only opportunity in the deployments, in my mind, is to continue to justify/test new weapon systems in the field. That's OK as long as everyone acknowledges it.

[235]  The stigma assigned to the assignment of teaching at West Point.

[236]  1. Given the recent friction between the Active force and the Guard and Reserve, how is this being addressed at the Academy? Times may have changed or my memory may have faded, but I don't recall this even being a consideration when I was a cadet. 2. The new APFT standards that are advertised as narrowing the gap between males and females sure as hell don't. What they do is make it harder for us old guys and easier for the young soldiers. This only exacerbates perceived inequities between males and females. Do the cadets currently test using Army standards or their own scale?

[237]  My biggest distress, however, is not something that West Point controls; and that is the end of the program of awarding a regular Army commission to graduates. It is tough for me to recommend West Point to a bright young prospect, when he/she has a good chance of being RIFed at any time in his/her career.

[238]  The "dumbing down" of the military in physical training, combat ethos, etc., etc., etc.

[239]  See above

[240]  Spending cuts hit the military hard, the Army harder, and USMA hardest of all. Congress and DoD seem to want USMA to do more with less, requiring the Supe and others to choose among equal spending priorities.

[241]  Elimination of RA commissions for graduates.

[242]  1. Lack of sufficient funding in all areas to keep West point abreast of the other Service Academies. 2. The mindless comparison of graduate retention and West Point's relevence in the face of repeated end strength drawdowns that afford opportunities for green lieutenants to leave before they have bonded with the Service. 3. Restraints on the Prep School that provides an extraordinary means to tailor the shape and character of the corps at relatively minimal cost.

[243]  I am concerned that the recent change in Basic Training for new soldiers, from co-ed to separate, will somehow be applied to the Academy (and other sources of commissioning). As a female graduate, I feel that it is necessary for officers to be trained in a "co-ed" environment. It is understandable that young enlistees may need that xtra barrier of protection, but this should not be applied to officer development.

[244]  The continued efforts to intigrate the Armed Forces, as regarding sex, without throughly thinking out, and recognizing the ligitimate differences between the sexes.

[245]  Lack of appropriated funds for the academy.

[246]  1) See 28 above. Political correctness is destructive. 2) USMA has been fairly successful in combating the civilianization of the academy (faculty, etc.) as proposed by various committees; must continue the fight to keep the military academy MILITARY. The best examples of what a professional officer should be that I saw as a cadet were the officer faculty members. My visit to USNA and its heavy civilian faculty helps explains why they seem to have more problems within their corps than USMA does.

[247]  Shrinking the size of Corps of Cadets - WP should be core source of commissioned officers and any shrinkage should come from other sources. Lack of Government Funding Civilian Instructors - prefer military Regular Commissions to all WP grads

[248]  We seem to be losing sight of what the military does for this country even in peace time. Part of this can be attributed to our President (US, not the AOG). Perhaps the AOG, USMA and others can do more to promote the military outside of the military itself. The Societies could help with this.

[249]  Of course the elimination of Regular Army commissions for the entire class remains troublesome, but I understand that issue is no longer open for negotiation. The risk, discussed above, is that West Point will be more easily viewed as another ROTC program.

[250]  I was surprised and disappointed to discover graduates are no longer automatically granted RA commissions. I realize the needs of the service has changed. However, I find that aspect hard to reconcile with the commitment asked of those attending the academy compared with other commissioning sources.

[251]  Congressional mandate on percentage of faculty that must be civilian.

[252]  Funding problems as enunciated at Society Leaders Conference

[253]  Budget mattters. Will fund raising impact what congress decides USMA needs to operate? Will congress off-load funding to grads?

[254]  1. Failure to live up to past promises relative to health care for retirees. 2. Failure of retired pay to keep pace with inflation and active duty pay increases.

[255]  I am very concerned about the erosion of barriers to homosexuals. I am somewhat concerned that continuing pressure to achieve parity for females will result in a cadet mix that doesn't reflect the need for combat leadership that is the only legitimate role for USMA.

[256]  My concern is that I am not aware of them!!!!

[257]  Any further civilianization of the faculty beyong the current 20-25%.

[258]  It is very important that USMA look to the future and determine what the leader of Army XXI and Army After Next requires and what leader developmental program changes need to be made to accomodate the needs of the future Army.

[259]  Lack of appropriate funding from Congress means USMA must become more like a civilian university and solicit gift funds to continue to operate at existing levels of excellence.

[260]  National Guard Combat Reform Initiative, contined within the '96 Defense Authorization Act which mandates a goal of 150 officers, between their 2nd and 3rd year of service, be allowed to resign and finish their service obligation in the National Guard. West Pointers are requesting a majority of the allocations.

[261]  - Women in combat/ women and men training together (not good) - US troops policing the world and dying/risking lives in areas failing to meet the "vital American interests" criteria (Somolia, Haiti, Bosnia) - An open homosexual's desire to serve (not a "right") vs all soldier's right to privacy in the barracks

[262]  Until President Jimmy Carter changed the rules, Cadet Pay was 1/2 of 2LT pay which allowed a Cadet to meet all of his bills at West Point and possibly have enough left over to either purchase or make large down payment on some rather expensive automobiles (I sure enjoyed that '64 Stingray). But the important thing was that the new Graduate was DEBT FREE. Mr Carter's action significantly reduced Cadet Pay to something less (I will admit ignorance of the revised schedule) such that new Graduates (I could be wrong) are significantly in debt and already well skilled in DEBT management at the very beginning of their careers. I may be overtaken by events, but Cadet Pay should be adequate for a Cadet to meet his/her bills while at West Point and graduate DEBT FREE. (Purchase of expensive sports car is not the intent of this suggestion.)

[263]  Not enough $$ for USMA...

[264]  1. Continued down-sizing of the Armed Forces is causing a corresponding attempt to down-size USMA. 2. The current Administration in Washington seems determined to undermine the military and Army, including USMA. 3. I am not as concerned as some about the Reserve Commission assignment for USMA grads, but that is something that should eventually be revisited.

[265]  Funding

[266]  The obvious lack of ethics demonstrated by the majority of our political leaders is in total contridiction to the values instilled at West Point. If this persists eventually a conflict will arise and given our motto DUTY, HONOR, COUNTRY our resolve to do the harder right could be our demise, I pray not!

[267]  I am opposed to quotas in any regard.

[268]  Cotinued funding cuts.

[269]  1. Pressure from politicians to make West Point grads more "sensitive."

[270]  For one, integrated training would appear to be instituted too quickly in the career development of soldiers. While I believe in both women in the Academy and the Army, more training at the Army level should be segregated until capabilites and desires are more accurately assessed. For another, there is too much emphasis placed on being a job in which to get money for additional education. I feel that this approach leads to a loss of commitment to the purpose of the Armed Services to protect and fight. Recent surveys have shown a disproportionate share of service members who would 'opt out' if faced with the prospect of combat. I would like to see the Army comprised of peaceloving professionals who are prepared to make the commitment required to protect our country and way of life. That may be too romantic an outlook, but that was philosophy when I enlisted, later attended the Academy, and attempted to prosecute my commission.

[271]  Budget Reserve Commissions vs RA

[272]  will the separation of barracks for male and female training (Nancy Kassembaum) affect anything at the acamdemy?

[273]  Acceptance of homosexual cadets/officers

[274]  Reserve officer status A Congress that does not understand USMA

[275]  multiple

[276]  the ones I am unaware of

[277]  differneces in standards between genders for PT and Height Weight Height Weight standards are too extreme PT Standards are too low Chemical readiness is very low in the Army and West Point is not helping by instilling the importance in their Cadets. They should be required to study these weapons in Chemistry class and should be required to study and practice the readiness excersises and techniques taught at the Chemical School.

[278]  The large and continuing reduction in Army size coupled with expanding deployments

[279]  I need to know the latest status of trying to make the academies a glorified ROTC program and a much reduced cost.

[280]  Reserve/Regular Army commissions Specialized undergraduate degrees

[281]  I concur with the Supe's position on Reserve commissions for graduates.

[282]  The overall use of the military for peacekeeping missions and the effect it is having on retention of our younger officers.

[283]  Not yet!

[284]  The deferral of regular army commissions

[285]  The Academy needs more funds to continue providing leaders of character for this nation.

[286]  Many , but to long to go into here - The Congress is corupted as well as the executive branch.. This spills over into DOD and then the mandatory reaction that the Army must follow the lead of the civilian leadership. The Army is abandoning its role of taking care of soldiers (to include retirees) Since the beginning of the the All Volunteer Force, we gone down hill in that soldiers serve and congress and the military leadership treat the force as paid employees. Duty, Honor, Country is passe in the Force.

[287]  € Inadequate for Infrastructure € Loss of RA commissions for graduates € Too many civilian (non-graduate) faculty members

[288]  Budget process and aproval

[289]  The entire downsizing concern.

[290]  See above.

[291]  I am concerned that the senior leadership of the Army seems more focused upon "politically correct" leadership than upon the good of the Army in the field. I am concerned that units are being "hollowed out" to portray a more capable force that actually exists. These perceptions are based upon what I have been told by friends and others still serving. I would like to know what is really the situation.

[292]  Policy concerning Regular Commissions

[293]  Women at West Point and Combat Arms

[294]  Too much attention to service and retirement benefits, rather than to the obligations of service

[295]  The change to a reserve commission. I believe that denigrates the value of an Academy education.

[296]  RA Commissions for Graduates

[297]  However, I am not aware of any mandates that USMA currently operates under. If I could see a list of these, I would be better prepared to answer this question.

[298]  Panel proposal that military segregate the sexes during initial training may affect the way we do Cadet Basic Training (CBT) I am for making CBT tougher, but genders must be integrated as we have been doing, in order for women to be accepted here.

[299]  length of service commitment (6 years) is discouraging to PARENTS of talented high schoolers who are important advisors in this process. this commitment should be realigned to be four years, making it consistent with ROTC, especially with all commissions now being reserve.

[300]  I'm sure there are many. Unfortunately, I am uninformed because of professional time constraints. The AOG Staff should identify these items and electronically call: "Attention to Orders"! I am currently employed at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory as the High Explosives Facility Operations Manager. Our primary mission is to support the Science Based (Nuclear) Stockpile Stewardship Program. As such, I see the effects of an administration which does not (apparently) appreciate the value of a strong national defense. I am very concerned about the security of our nation. Maintaining a quality Army with a superior officer core is a key component in our national defense that must be maintained if we are to prevail as a nation and ensure the survival of freedom.

[301]  Downsizing of US Army Reserve.

[302]  * "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and all it's implications upon trust and comeraderie among units in the Army.

[303]  The movement to eliminate the Service Academies. The failure to directly commission RA upon graduation.

[304]  There are indications that the military is diverging from the population with respect to ethics and values. I don't want to see us as an elitist group but at the same time I want those values of Duty, Honor, and Country to have an impact on our population. The AOG should take a leadership position in this area.

[305]  RA commissions civilian professors service obligation

[306]  West Point Grads having to compete with ROTC on even basis at graduation (no earlier date of ranking given for more difficult experience)

[307]  ditto, letter followup

[308]  See 28

[309]  Increased use of civilian instructors.

[310]  But, I'm out of time right now.

[311]  Army (not West Point) leadership is apparently not making the case for the viability of the Academy with the Congress/Congressional Staff. If West Point does not have the support of the Congress, the leadership has failed and WP is in jeopardy.

[312]  clinton

[313]  See 28. Closer cooperation among the Service Academies may be able to demonstrate movement toward a unified/Joint US military that was not achieved with the latest QDR or the recomendations of the NDP.

[314]  When I graduated from West Point, I was eager and ready to be a leader. When I was in the Army, I felt stifled and bored. The Army did not allow me the challenges and opportunities that I felt I could get elsewhere. I strongly believe the Army fails West Point graduates. We want autonomy, challenge, responsibility, and a chance to make a difference. When you see all the younger grads leaving the Army, they are leaving for these reasons. The problem is so large I don't even know how to begin addressing a solution in a short survey. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the answers to my survey.

[315]  - don't ask, don't tell - graduates receiving Reserve Commissions

[316]  I cannot give specifics, but my broad concern is that the number one priority of the Army and West Point has shifted away from combat effectiveness.

[317]  Building aircraft/ships, etc. we do not need while 30,000 military families are on welfare (assuming the latter is correct)

[318]  1. Force Structure reductions 2. Male/Female integration in Basic Training 3. Extended deployment of U.S. forces

[319]  There are different performance standards for different groups within the Academy, but only one Oath of Office and one level of expectation that the nation has for the level of excellence of its military leaders.

[320]  Dissolution of the Regular Army--which I see as a big step towrd the dissolution of the Academy itself. I begin to sound like a right-wing Fud--which I am not--but my thirty-four years in the RA,as S/Sgt,Cadet, and Officer means a lot to me. It has been my life with its attendant strains on my family--and now we are prepared to throw it away for, for what ?

[321]  Loss of Regular Army commissions for graduates. If these are not designated "regulars", than pray tell, who is?

[322]  Every single appointment decision to the Academy has the potential to be crucial for the future of this country. Any candidate could become a critical leader in a pivotal conflict... so it would be interesting and helpful to know the criteria which each individual member of Congress uses to select cadets and midshipmen. Over the years I have been asked about the political "pull" required to obtain an appointment, with the implication being that candidates with "connections" are selected. People perceive that such practices exist. If they exist, either blatantly or subtly, then the academy is not receiving the optimal raw material, and the country is not being served. The AOG, which is not an operational entity of the Academy could possibly be a very good vehicle to pursue this matter.

[323]  recent changes regarding integrated training in the military. how iwll that effect USMA.

[324]  Not giving RA commissions to WP Grads upon graduation. Should be reinstated. Estimated cost of the four years at WP, as used by congress, and others, should be reduced or changed to reflect the give-back of service.

[325]  Overall level of support for academy

[326]  The elimination of the Regular Commission for new graduates is a very serious one and the spin put on it by the Supe at the last West Point Societies Presidents meeting was sickening. To state that the commanders in the field had seen no evidence of any problem because of the new law was totally misleading. There is no way that they would know if there was an effect since the first class wasn't in the field as of July 1997.

[327]  BUDGET CUTS!!

[328]  The growing sense of dissonance between the military and the national conscience. This is increasingly reflected in the questioning and micromanagement of what were once traditional areas preserves of military policy and procedures.

[329]  "Norming" of promotions across all commissioning sources. Don't want USMA grads to be favored - just don't want them restricted to a percentage or quota of promotables.

[330]  The West Point product is tremendously more expensive than the ROTC & OCS alternative. As such, graduates must perform better, serve more faithfully, and contribute considerably more--inorder to justify the greater tax payer expense. What happens when the tax payers discover that today's West Pointers are not appreciably better performers, resign their commissions at rates equal to or higher than the souther commissioning sources, and don't contribute any more than their ROTC or OCS contemporaries? Producing officers is a business. The competition is keen and West Points today are not worth what they cost.

[331]  Size of the Corp vs. size of the Forces.

[332]  Don't know! Policy mandates usually follow considersble debate, analysis, advice and consent! Possibly not well informed on any of these matters, even though all discussions are supposed to become part of the public record unless classified for national defense reasons. This question probably reflects substantial political innuendo. The AOG could help keep the membership informed on these matters. What Congressional Committes delve into USMA affairs? Do these committees have web pages where their activities get routinely posted? More and better service could be provided in this area!

[333]  Not sure

[334]  In conversations with classmates still in the military, there is concern about the downsizing of the military while at the same time overseas commitments increase (Bosnia, Macedonia, Somalia). The strain on family life brought on by these extended tours makes it more difficult to retain quality officers.

[335]  Go back to RA Commissions

[336]  Funding for the academy; proposals to eliminate or merge the academies

[337]  The elimination of RA appointments for all USMA grads.

[338]  The current level of Defense funding presents particular challenges to the Academy in maintaining the West Point experience which makes our "education" unique.

[339]  The failure to recognize the sacrifice of four years at the Academy when compared to to ROTC or OCS so far as a Regular Army commission is concerned.

[340]  1.POLITICAL CORRECTNESS 2. DITTO 3. DITTO

[341]  Regular commissioning process, women in combat.

[342]  Any cutbacks in funding always concern me.

[343]  increased service obligation

[344]  Funding,reserve commisions

[345]  The commissioning process, and the funding situations must be examined closely by Congress in order to maintain the path the Academy has followed for almost 200 years.

[346]  Can not give specifics due to pure ignorance on my part.But the attempts to ease standards is unacceptable.

[347]  All Grads should be regular officers. So should all c. I realize this is not going to change anytime soon.

[348]  DA implementation of RA commissioning

[349]  Political correctness, denigration of combat arms, increased civilianization of faculty....

[350]  DA implementation of RA commissioning Law.

[351]  I believe that the 4 class system is an improvement but the "4th Class System" went a long way in term of instilling discipline.

[352]  The Army leadership's failure to address declining readiness levels in the force has led to unethical behavior throughout the officer corps as commanders try to accomplish too many missions with limited resources. No one in the Army leadership ever talks to the force about integrity or ethics.

[353]  Not requiring graduates to enter the Army on active duty. Reserve commissions should be reserved for ROTC graduates. Various recommendations by Congressional members to close the Academy in favor of ROTC and OCS.

[354]  i think any attempt to further civilianize the faculty to meet some congressionally mandated goals is a mistake. again it is putting west point on the trail to being a super rotc program and not the unique educational and military experience it has been in the past.

[355]  Attempts to close USMA

[356]  The commissioning of USMA graduates as Reserve officers, rather than RA. The continued underfunding of USMA requirements, such that the WPF is expected to make up the shortfalls in areas that were previously supported through appropriated funds.

[357]  Women at the Academy. I know there's nothing we can do about it, but I think it has had a monumental negative impact on the reason for USMA's existence and its viability for the future. I supported the change throughout my career because it was the law of the land and I wanted to be a constructive element for USMA. I still want to believe that the American people want this and it's the right thing for America, but over the years I have concluded that I'm kidding myself about it. I DO NOT believe that it's the right thing to do.

[358]  USMA needs to continue to prove its value added over ROTC and other commissioning

[359]  I have reservations about the direction of the military, in general. I am not familiar with the "mandates" on USMA, but I suspect that many of my concerns with the military are reflected in the ideals of USMA.

[360]  I am deeply concerned about the gradual but steady erosion of the image of West Point, as demonstrated in the end of RA commissions, the talk (whether substantive or not) of closing, and the rising perception that West Point is "just another ROTC college."

[361]  The need to economize is without question the backbone behind many decisions. My concern: does the West Point officer set a "priceless" standard for all officers. My observations of West Point 2LT's does not always indicate the West Point commission is hands down better than other commissioning sources. This is not good.

[362]  Down sizing of our armed forces

[363]  The continued erosion of retirement and medical benifits for retirees has loosened the social contaract that used to exist between the Republic and its officer and non-commissioned officer corps. This, over time, could impinge negatively on the academy.

[364]  I'm not sure of many, but the whole issue of female cadets (and female soldiers and officers in general) is one better solved by excluding them. On other issues, again, most of what I have heard is hearsay.

[365]  Congressional position on Regular Army commissions DA application of this mandate, which made the matter worse Army Secretariat pressure on Honor Code enforcement

[366]  Current national policies regarding homosexuals in the military is a grave concern for West Point. Given the current climate, mandates for recruiting homosexuals for USMA are the next step. This will be a grave problem.

[367]  I am opposed to the civilianization of the faculty.

[368]  See #28, above.

[369]  The budget.

[370]  As i see the academy become more and more like other comission sources, I wonder how long it will be able to be funded in our downsizing military

[371]  "Don't tell policy" How can you have a policy which is in direct contravention to honesty. I can not square this policy with the ideals and traditions of the Academy.

[372]  Insufficient funding for facilities Lack of Regular Army Commission

[373]  Composition of faculty

[374]  The loss of the Regular Army Commission.

[375]  I would like the Academies to return to a combat arms and small unit leadership emphasis - even more so than when I was a cadet. My interpretation of the changes over the past years is that the military aspect of the Academy has been de-emphasized way too much in favor of academics. I believe the primary job of WP is to prepare effective combat leaders - not lawyers or engineers.

[376]  Decreasing emphasis on affirmative action programs may cause a significant decline in the pool of available minority students for accession into West Point. I would consider developing a program to increase this pool to maintain qualified applicants.

[377]  Do you seriously believe that our elected officials have the slightest clue as to the ideals of the Academy or that they are in the least truly interested in its welfare? Throughout our history as a nation, the military (and all of its institutions) have been pawns of our elected officials. The pendulum consistently swings from need to disdain. We are merely witnessing one more swing of that pendulum. Hopefully the Academy (and our nation) will survive it.

[378]  Congressional questions on the value of the Academy require very serious reasoned replies.

[379]  THE CUTS IN THE BUDGET FOR THE ACDADEMY.

[380]  The continued focus on the feminization of the services, with standards of performance being lowered. This has to have a detrimental impact on our force's readiness.

[381]  SAME AS ABOVE. FEMALES HAVE CHANGED THE ENTIRE SYSTEM , AND IT SEEMS THE GOALS AS WELL

[382]  My response in item 28 applies. I am afraid that the insidious shift of West Point from providing RA officers prepared for combat leadership in the frontlines to a liberal, politically correct non-RA oriented student body is about to destroy the need for a USMA. I believe that the AOG can provide the point leadership to help guide West Point back to the mission for which I believe it was intended-to train a hard corps of professional career combat leaders as a national resource.

[383]  Service obligations. Status of RA officers in shrinking force. Regulation of the Academy operations.

[384]  I don't like USMA grads not getting RA commissions...there is a definite difference between WP grads and ROTC grads and it should be reflected in their status

[385]  See the above comments. The areas where congress does not see it as their area of concern,

[386]  Technical issues that I will express to the appropriate officials at the proper time.

[387]  The policy calling for reserve commissions for USMA graduates is extremely troubling. It further narrows the observable difference between USMA graduates and those from ROTC and other sources, and could cause decision-makers to question why the nation spends so much more for USMA grads.

[388]  The policy of now granting only a AUS commission, instead of a RA commission was one of the dumbest things that our congress ever did. If you have to put up with the crap that USMA dishes out and the lack of civilian privileges that people going to ROTC programs can enjoin in return for the education at USMA, then why should graduates not be entitled to a RA commission for the time they are on active duty? NROTC scholarship recipients get basically the same benefits as USMA people get and they do not have to put with the rules and regulations for four years that people at USMA do, why can't academy people (any academy) at least be entitled to a Regular commision upon graduation? I realize AOG can't answer this, and it is due to the idiots that the American people have elected to Congress (most of whom never served in uniform, like our illustrious Wimp-in Chief-Mr. Clinton).

[389]  The AOG and its graduates are out of touch with the reasons causing so many younger graduates to leave the Army after 5 years or earlier. The many changes (retirement, VA, medical, etc., etc.)that have occurred over the last 15-20 years makes the Army a very different place. Not a single USMA general stood up to counter any of these changes. Yet, they are the ones who will likely scream about attrition. Thus, my opinion re the reduction of generals on the BOT.

[390]  1. West Point appears to be bending to too many political pressures. Must continue to "educate" political leaders on the value of the institution to the nation. Value can be judged simply on "officer production." This should be a fundamental role of AOG.

[391]  See 28. Also, I understand that USMA graduates do not get Regular Army commissions upon graduation. That is absurd. AOG should work to reverse that decision.

[392]  General lack of appreciation for the Academy and its mission as evidenced in budget cutbacks and other attempts to diminish the importance of West Point.

[393]  Reduce Corps Size Graduate to the Combat Arms and direct Support Branches only. Return Regular Commission upon graduation Reinstate the Department of Military Psychology and Leadership. Behavioral Science belongs at Johns Hopkins. Restore Plebe Christmas and close order drill. The last time I saw a parade on the plain, it was really amateurish.

[394]  Regular Commission policy

[395]  budget cutbacks, the decreasing "warrior" attitude that is being professed at USMA. Sensitivity training can only go so far before it begins to erode the warfighting attitude of the American soldier

[396]  Lack of guranteed health care. Removal of guarnteed RA commission and thus grads leaving active duty within 2 years.

[397]  Medical care for active and retired Retired pay/raises figured to decrease ones retirement benefit

[398]  The reduction of the standing army and the implications of that reduction for USMA and the Nation.

[399]  Continued drawdown means size will need to be reduced; Drive to civilian faculty is misdirected

[400]  I am very concerned with the reduction of funds appropiated each year to the military. I know that as congress and executive decisons continue to restrict funds for the military; the cadets themselves are restricted to achieving the best they can. I never experienced the severe cutbacks the cadets have today.

[401]  I am still concerned about the occasional discussion of abolishing the Regular Army commission of Academy graduates. I sincerely believe that the West Point experience provides a solid foundation for new lieutenants that can not be replicated by the ROTC program.

[402]  There should be a separate regiment for female cadets. That's not really a government mandate, but I didn't think it would fit in with Category 28.

[403]  IMPROVING THE RETENTION IN THE SERVICE OF MORE GRADUATES

[404]  Loss of RA Commissions Downsizing of the Corps

[405]  None that I'm aware of.

[406]  See above.

[407]  Loss of regular commissions for graduates. Impact of women on the Academy.

[408]  Currently, Title 11 requires the active army to transfer a minimum of 150 lieutenants (with 2-3 years of service) to the reserve component each year. This is done regardless of source of commission. West Point graduates routinely take this route, leaving the active army prior to the end of their active committment. This severely undermines the committment of academy graduates. The law should be changed to restrict USMA graduates from leaving under this program prior to the end of their active committment. If not possible, then the Army implementation should limit USMA graduate participation.

[409]  Payback service commitment length -- is there a decrease in interest to attend West Point???

[410]  Justification to Congress and the Administration of the "value" of the USMA experience and education

[411]  the loss of Regular Army status by graduates

[412]  The general trend toward the reduction of the academies and increase of ROTC promotion

[413]  I believe that USMA graduates should be commissioned in the Regular Army. I will be happy to discuss this further.

[414]  The Army/Military is not a place for social reform This "how do you feel about it" social experiment will get a lot of people killed in the next conflict.

[415]  See above. Change in training for males and females could have a dramatic impact. The civilainization of the faculty is also passed the functional--there is alot ofvalue for active duty officers in the classroom.

[416]  1. The growing (as incredulous as it seems in light of current policy) emphasis on diversity. 2. Continued "downsizing" of the military leads many elected officials to USMA's value. The continued slide away from absolute values (duty, honor, country) or, rather, the lack of concensus as to what these mean, may lead some to question USMA's relevance.

[417]  -"Don't ask, don't tell" -Graduation with a reserve commission -Too high a percentage of civilian faculty

[418]  Lack of RA commissioning for USMA and ROTC DMG's. Potential future pushes to increase the service commitment of graduates.

[419]  Regular commissions, branch allocation, combat arms detailing for all cadets who are medically qualified for the combat arms but who go to CS/CSS branhes.

[420]  I'd rather not see USMA abolished by act of Congress.

[421]  1. The current policy on homesexuals in the military is wrong and will hurt readiness. 2. The current policy of integrating women into many combat arms specialties.

[422]  Loss of automatic Regular Army Commissions

[423]  1. Congressional authorization to enter "women" into the Academy. 2. Congressional pressure to eliminate the Military Academies.

[424]  1) Concern about polical correctness impacting the right thing to do. Case of Lt Flynn (USAF) and her initial congressional support comes to mind. USAF still discharged her and stood their ground. I'm sure USMA would do the same, but would need AOG backing.

[425]  USMA graduates not receiving Regular Army commissions.

[426]  I keep hearing rumors about considering closing or consolidating the Academies. I would like to be kept apprized of any such initiatives and would help in any way to retain USMA as a national resource.

[427]  Role of women in the military. Needs intense debate and evaluation....very hard to do in this political climate. I am an "old grad", but commanded units with women, and am not convinced that they should have combat roles, nor that they deserve public funding as cadets. There is significant impact on military readiness already, and the debate must be joined.

[428]  The same as above.

[429]  Same as I've said before. I feel that West Point isn't as tough as it used to be. The touchy-feely crowd is in control (and I am a psychologist.) I fear civilianization and reduction to an ROTC program. Trendy, politically-correct issues dominate.

[430]  Too long to comment on. Most of Usma's problems come from outside pressure and the brass in the army and at WP don't have the guts to stop it. The last leader to fall on his sword was Jim Gavin. We need more like him

[431]  Reduced budget requires greater effort in fund raising.

[432]  1. Reduced funding 2. No Regular Army commissions

[433]  See comments above. Proper role for women in military while protecting/excluding them from combat.

[434]  I am concerned with the current government attitude about reducing the size of our military, the inability to understand the military's purpose during periods of perceived peace, and the impact of this on funding and confidence in the Academy.

[435]  Giving Reserve commissions from USMA

[436]  We need to make sure that the ideals and goals of West Point are not watered down by political/social fads. Tradition, honor, and the military ethic are what make WP different and strong. I DON'T WANT it to be just another college, only with uniforms.

[437]  I have great concern that as we raise funds for the Academy, Congress will make corresponding cuts in funds made available. There is more but again, do not have the time right now to respond.

[438]  1. Not giving Regular Army commissions upon graduation

[439]  Failure by Army, DOD, to push for regular commissions for service academy graduates upon graduation.

[440]  Discussions concerning the future existence of the academies

[441]  The awarding of reserve rather than regular commissions.

[442]  None of the above have a clue, either.

[443]  - Aforementioned commissioning issue - Change in number of years of mandatory service which will only lead to erosion of public support for funding of the Academy because the "free education" will be viewed as a welfare program - Staffing of the Department of the Army with individuals who obviously are devoid of military service experience and seek to drive the Army closer to their personal vision of a politically-correct police force. These individuals are easily identifiable by their lack of historical perspective, their misinterpretation of inter-service rivalry, and their general ignorance of role of our founding fathers' intentions for the military's role in defending our republic.

[444]  Being a non-graduate and so much time passing from when I was a cadet at West Point, worried about the welfare of the Academy and how military and civilian interests view it. With the three most recent Chief of Staff of Joint Chiefs (from Army) not being West Pointers, I visualize a lack of importance on West Point's training and character in those officers from whom candidates could be selected. Worry that this is an indication that government officials feel an officer from ROTC background is as solid as West Point's regimen. Having been in ROTC at Wake Forest College (at time I was there they were still a college) and then attending West Point, there is no similarity. Also concerned that funding and even existence of Academy may be affected by this mindset. I very much see the need and importance of continuing a West Point as strong or stronger than what I experienced while there. Also concerned that academic personnel may now be more from civilian institutions than graduates of West Point. Not an intellectual, but if USMA is made to more like other schools, is it not dooming itself to distinction? How can it justify expense of continuing if education there is more like the other colleges which have ROTC? Government sources could then see need to roll back funding. After all, we now are viewing in this time of history, where more graduates are created than can be used in Army in its scaled back posture. My personal conviction is that we as a nation need a strong Army now, but certainly need to continue to produce strong disciplined and character oriented graduates for now and the future. How many times in the past has our nation had to play catch up to protect its interests. At a time of supposed peace, it is easy for a society to be lulled into feeling the need to cut back a standing military force. I view a strong military deterent as an insurance policy. You don't want to have to use it, but it is good to have it available when needed. I guess you can see my sentiment is strongly West Point even though I did not graduate. Had I not been supportive of West Point, I would not have so rigorously sought to become a cadet. Thanks for allowing me this time and space to share my thoughts. This type of inovative spirit from West Point (AOG) continues to impress me with its mission. Keep up the great work! Just personal concerns. This could also affect the amount of giving institution might receive from graduates and business in open solicitation.

[445]

[446]  Although I am no longer closely monitoring current Congressional initiatives, I am continually amazed at the lack of recognition and awareness that Congressional and other highly placed public officials have of the Academies and the contribution that they make to the Armed Services. I