topleft
topright

Want This Page Wider?

Use the A+, A-, R, and <> or <-> buttons at the top right of this page to make the fonts bigger and smaller or switch between a fixed-width and fluid-width style to this web site.

Syndicate

E-mail Bouncing?

In an effort to control spam, WP-ORG has implemented several blacklists that may be blocking your e-mail to a WP-ORG list or account.  Click here to fill out a trouble ticket.

How Can I Help WP-ORG?

  • Donate to one of WP-ORG's semi-annual fund drives. 
  • Buy anything at Amazon.com through our Gradstore affilate program.
  • Support our paid advertisers listed at our affiliates page.
  • Send a message to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it to inquire about advertising rates on WP-ORG.
Advertisement
US Army Leaders Make Case for AMPV Decision PDF Print E-mail
HUNTSVILLE, Ala. US Army officials shot down the possibility for a wheeled ambulance variant of the armored multipurpose vehicle (AMPV), just the latest chapter in a drama over the vehicle between industry, the Army and Capitol Hill.

In December, the US Army awarded a contract worth $1.2 billion to BAE Systems to begin building the AMPV. BAE was the only contractor still in the running after General Dynamics Land Systems pulled out of the competition in May, complaining that the Army's requirements unfairly favored the tracked Bradley fighting vehicle derivative that BAE was submitting.

BAE is signed to deliver 29 vehicles in five variants in a 52-month engineering, manufacturing and development phase that will lead to a contract to replace all 2,897 M113 vehicles in the Army's armored brigade combat teams (ABCTs). However, GD lobbied the Hill get its eight-wheeled Stryker vehicle in the running for an ambulance variant and another 1,922 M113s in use supporting echelons above brigade (EAB) the service eventually wants to replace.

In a brief at an Association of the US Army convention here, acquisitions officials strove to put the matter to rest, outlining why the BAE's tracked vehicle provided the best mobility, as compared with the Stryker on a variety of terrain, particularly for an ABCT, and defending the program's fairness.
 
< Prev   Next >

Recent Fallen Grads

Who's Online

We have 4 guests online

West-Point.Org (WP-ORG), a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization not affiliated officially with the United States Military Academy, provides an online communications infrastructure that enables graduates, parents, and friends of the military academy to maintain and strengthen the associations that bind us together. We will provide this community any requested support, consistent with this purpose, as quickly and efficiently as possible. WP-ORG is funded by the generosity of member contributions. Our communication services are provided in cooperation with the AOG (independent of USMA) and are operated by volunteers serving the Long Gray Line. Contents of and comments on this web site do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy or the Department of the Army.  For questions or comments, please email us at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

DISCLAIMER:  This website is privately owned and operated.  The contents of this site, including words, images, and opinions, are unofficial and not to be considered as the official views of the the United States Military Academy, United States Army, or Department of Defense.  This site is not endorsed by the United States Military Academy, United States Army, or Department of Defense.  Users accept and agree to this disclaimer in the use of any information obtained from this website.
Joomla Template by Joomlashack
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack Joomla Templates