CLASS GIFT VOTE
BACKGROUND
CHAIR's COMMENTS
BRET'S LETTER
GIFT OPTIONS
GIFT COMMITTEE
|
|
CLASS GIFT VOTE
Ballots for the
class gift selection were mailed in mid-June 2000. Voting closed
officially on 15 Sep 00 though votes received up to the date of the
reunion were tallied. Of the 829 ballots mailed, 211 were returned
which is a slightly higher level of response than most classes.
Not all classmates were sent ballots. Some classmates are
"lost" to the AOG and some have indicated that they do not
wish to receive mailings from the AOG or class. The voting
results:
MSAC Halftime
Room
42 votes 19.9%
Domestic Affairs Forum Endowment
23
10.9%
Center for Enhanced Performance
37
17.5%
Competitive Sports
Endowment
41
19.4%
Bicentennial
Unrestricted
60
28.4%
Other
8
3.8%
BACKGROUND
The class gift committee has worked hard
through the spring and summer to develop a slate of gifts for
consideration by our class. To be up front, none of the gift
options provides a large, visible structure. This can be
attributed to three things -- the vision of the current Superintendent,
the timing of our gift selection, and realistic expectations on the
amount of money we can raise.
To start a gift concept from scratch, the class
must develop a concept, get that concept approved by the West Point
Installation Planning Board, and then get the concept blessed by the
Superintendent. It's a long process, particularly if the proposed
gift does not meet the Installation Design Guides, does not fit with the
existing Installation Master Plan or falls outside the Supe's vision.
What exactly is the Superintendent's vision?
From his articles in Assembly and the e-mail messages, one can
see that LTG Christman is focused on overcoming years of neglect to the
infrastructure at West Point, to achieve top tier facilities for our
major athletic teams (recruiting tool), and to ensure our cadet sports,
academic and interest clubs have a reasonable level of funding (when I
was OIC for the Astronomy Club, we received $45 per year which hardly
buys a book for the club much less pay for new equipment). Don't
overlook the O&M budget plus up he has achieved for the next 10
years - $20 million per year.
For the infrastructure, LTG Christman has
received the commitment from the Secretary of the Army and Congress to
buy off the maintenance backlog. His e-mail of 10 August 2000
cited the Mahan Hall renovation ($50 million) and new Arvin Cadet
Development Center ($77.5 million) as examples.
The Bicentennial fund raising campaign is the Supe's
efforts to fix the second two areas. He developed a list of
projects to meet this vision and currently he is accepting only gifts
that supports the vision. The choices offered by the Gift
Committee are their best effort to give a diverse group choices yet
still be meaningful to us as a class. Perhaps we can donate our
gate or cemetery entrance as a 30th or 40th anniversary gift. We
still have time to immortalize our class. I hope we rise together, meet our goal this time around and
begin the process to get our "brick and mortar" legacy for our
next gift.
|